This guide highlights eight top PTaaS companies in 2025—Cybri, Bishop Fox, Astra Security, Cobalt, BreachLock, Rhino Security Labs, Pentera, and SecureLayer7—and compares them based on strengths like tester expertise, platform usability, retesting support, developer workflow integration, compliance outputs, pricing transparency, and responsiveness. It includes a vendor-by-vendor breakdown, tailored recommendations for different company sizes and technical needs, and a FAQ section covering PTaaS basics, speed, cost, and compliance readiness.
Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS) has emerged as a modern approach to security testing that addresses the speed, scalability, and continuous delivery needs of today’s businesses. According to Gartner, they position PTaaS “as a high-benefit solution that is two to five years from mainstream adoption, with 20-50% of the target audience having already adopted it to meet compliance requirements and to conduct more security testing with more impactful results while keeping costs down” [1].
And from a business perspective, PTaaS being cost-effective and quick is especially crucial, as traditional penetration tests often involve weeks of scheduling and lead time, followed by a big PDF report that arrives long after development has moved on. In contrast, PTaaS platforms let you spin up tests as needed and see issues as they are found, potentially cutting testing cycles dramatically. Experts estimate that PTaaS engagements are completed about 50% faster than conventional consulting engagements on average.
So in order to account for this shifting trend and help executives in tech roles, we’ll use this guide to break down the key criteria so you can evaluate a range of different PTaaS providers and profile some of the best PTaaS vendors in 2025 for your specific purposes. We’ll also touch on which vendors excel in certain areas, and even include a FAQ section to address common questions about PTaaS, report speed, costs, compliance, and more.
Key Evaluation Criteria for PTaaS Providers
Alright, we’ve covered why you should consider PTaaS, so let us move on to the next topic of how to evaluate and determine which vendor and solutions fits your business and your team the best. After all, not all PTaaS providers are equal – each has its strengths and focus areas.
Criteria | What to Look For |
Tester Quality & Expertise | Ensure testing is led by real humans, not just tools. Look for certified, senior ethical hackers with proven experience. |
Platform Usability | The PTaaS platform should be intuitive for both technical and non-technical users. Features like real-time updates, clear visuals, and collaboration tools are essential. |
Retesting & Remediation | Top providers help with fixing issues, not just reporting them. Look for fix recommendations, tester Q&A access, and retesting options. |
Dev Workflow Integration | PTaaS should integrate smoothly with your existing tools. Check for APIs and plug-ins for Jira, GitHub, GitLab, CI/CD, etc. |
Compliance Reporting | Ensure the service supports audit-friendly reporting. Look for templates or formats aligned with frameworks like SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR etc. |
Pricing Transparency | Clear, upfront pricing avoids surprises. Look for models like fixed-fee or subscriptions based on test scope and frequency. |
Responsiveness & Support | Fast, reliable support is key during testing and remediation. A dedicated point of contact and time-zone aligned help are big pluses. |
Top PTaaS Service Providers in 2026: Vendor-by-Vendor Breakdown
There are several PTaaS companies prominent in the current market, each with a slightly different approach and strengths. So in order for you to quickly get an overview of their strengths we have provided a table of eight top vendors.
Company | Best For | Tech Stack Experience | Retesting & Remediation Support |
Cybri | PTaas built for engineering-led SaaS; lightning-fast; expert-driven; real results | Hand-picked U.S.-based certified ethical hackers. | Real-time collaboration in BlueBox; compliance-mapped reports; easy scheduling of retests |
Bishop Fox | Large enterprises needing continuous coverage & advanced security testing | Deep technical expertise; strong in large-scale, complex, multi-cloud environments | Deep technical support; ongoing testing; red teaming options alongside remediation recommendations |
Astra | Fast-growing SaaS and mid-size firms seeking DevSecOps integrated testing | Combines manual pentesting with an automated scanner; covers web apps, APIs; CI/CD and Jira integrations | Includes retests; actionable fix advice; manual validation to support remediation; real-time tracking |
Cobalt | Agile teams and startups requiring quick, flexible pentest cycles | Vetted freelance tester network (Cobalt Core); rapid test kickoff; strong Jira/GitHub integration | In-platform chat with testers; continuous updates; easy retest requests |
Breachlock | Compliance-driven organizations wanting an all-in-one, scalable testing platform | Hybrid platform with CREST-certified testers + automation; OWASP, OSSTMM, and NIST aligned; suitable for broad asset coverage | Unlimited retests included in subscription; centralized dashboard for issue resolution and ticketing |
Rhino Security Labs | Companies needing deep cloud security testing and personalized, expert assessments | Boutique expertise in AWS, cloud, and network environments; less platform-focused but highly technical | Detailed, personalized reports; follow-up advisory available; offers periodic retests as part of managed service |
Pentera | Internal security teams seeking a tool to continuously auto-penetration-test and validate defenses | Automated Security Validation across network, endpoints, and identity layers; requires in-house operation | Self-service remediation roadmap based on exploit chains; no direct human-led retesting unless paired with other services |
SecureLayer7 | Smaller enterprises and DevOps teams needing quick pentests and ongoing vulnerability scanning | Web and API testing focus; rapid test launch via BugDazz platform; Jira integration for dev workflows | Continuous vulnerability monitoring; real-time findings; Jira alerts; retest options available |
1. Cybri
Best for: Organizations that want a streamlined, high-touch pentesting service.
Cybri is a PTaaS pentesting company focused on delivering high-quality, no-friction security testing. Founded in 2017, Cybri offers application and network penetration tests conducted by hand-picked, U.S.-based testers who specialize in modern SaaS stacks like React, Node.js, AWS, GCP, and Azure. Tests are typically completed in weeks, aligning with standards such as SOC 2 and other compliance frameworks.
Cybri is trusted by CTOs, DevOps teams, engineers, and security leaders at SaaS companies to meet enterprise buyer requirements without slowing down release cycles. This makes Cybri ideal for growing SaaS and tech-driven mid-market companies looking to bolster their security posture—especially when onboarding enterprise, healthcare, or financial sector clients requiring rigorous third-party testing and compliance validation.
The platform also includes BlueBox, a real-time dashboard that integrates with Jira, GitHub, and CI/CD pipelines, streamlining remediation workflows and aligning reports with compliance standards like SOC 2, GDPR, and HIPAA.
Website: https://cybri.com/
2. Bishop Fox
Best for: Large enterprises and high-security organizations that want an enterprise-grade continuous testing partner.
Bishop Fox is one of the more established players in the penetration testing space, with roughly 20 years of experience and a focus on large enterprise clients with budgets and systems to match. Their PTaaS solution revolves around the Cosmos platform — a continuous testing and attack surface management tool designed for organizations with complex environments like multi-cloud or hybrid infrastructures.
Bishop Fox provides a fairly wide range of offensive security services, such as strategic advisory and red teaming, in addition to penetration testing services. Their experience may be useful for businesses with sizable, intricate environments, like multi-cloud or hybrid infrastructures. Although they offer a variety of services, including PTaaS, their emphasis is frequently more enterprise-aligned than specifically designed for contemporary SaaS teams seeking efficient, test-driven workflows.
Website: https://bishopfox.com/
3. Astra Security
Best for: Engineering-centric organizations that want a DevOps-integrated, continuous pentesting solution.
Teams looking for user-friendly dashboards and superficial insights might favor Astra’s security suite, which combines automation with a lesser amount of manual testing. However, their strategy compared to some of the other names on this list is more generic—focused on more general website and app security—and isn’t always designed for complex SaaS infrastructure or engineering-led workflows.
Astra provides automated scanning that includes some manual testing in every engagement and covers popular frameworks like SANS 25 and OWASP Top 10. Although businesses with fast release cycles or limited in-house security resources may find this hybrid approach helpful, the manual component usually enhances automation rather than replaces it. Astra might be better suited for baseline testing than advanced coverage for teams with intricate SaaS stacks or seeking more in-depth technical involvement.
Website: https://www.getastra.com/
4. Cobalt
Best for: Agile teams and mid-size companies that need on-demand pentesting with tight integration into development workflows.
Cobalt is one of the pioneers of the PTaaS model and remains a prominent platform in 2025. Their platform, which offers comparatively quick test launches and a SaaS interface to manage engagements, links businesses with independent pentesters from their vetted “Cobalt Core” network. By using this model, businesses can access outside talent without having to develop internal security capabilities.
With an emphasis on integrated communication and collaboration, the Cobalt Central platform covers project scoping, tester assignment, reporting, and retesting. The platform is ultimately a marketplace-first model, even though it works well for managing numerous tests across larger teams. For engineering-led SaaS teams looking for strict control and closer collaboration throughout the process, the workflow may feel less straightforward or flexible, and testing quality and speed may differ based on the freelancer pool.
Website: https://www.cobalt.io/
5. BreachLock
Best for: Organizations that want a comprehensive, one-stop pentesting platform with both manual and automated testing.
The PTaaS provider BreachLock places a strong emphasis on automation and integration with current security processes. The platform is compatible with frameworks such as OWASP, NIST, and OSSTMM and offers options for manual testing, usually with CREST-certified testers. It also supports continuous scanning. Although it has manual capabilities, the larger model is more focused on speed and scale than it is on high-touch guidance or hands-on collaboration, which are frequently crucial for SaaS teams preparing for enterprise security reviews.
Results are handled through an integrated ticketing system, and turnaround is fairly quick—some tests begin within 24 to 48 hours. Businesses with large attack surfaces and frequent testing requirements, particularly those seeking a simplified, primarily automated solution, can benefit from BreachLock’s methodology. However, teams looking for more specialized feedback or deeper strategic support linked directly to application architecture or compliance preparation may find the engagement model more generalized than collaborative.
Website: https://www.breachlock.com/
6. Rhino Security Labs
Best for: Companies that require deep expertise, especially in cloud and network penetration testing, with a personalized touch.
Rhino Security Labs is a penetration testing company that also offers PTaaS capabilities for ongoing engagements. They are particularly well-known for web application and network evaluations, as well as cloud-focused testing, especially in AWS environments. Rhino offers services like recurrent scans and retests as part of ongoing consulting packages, even though their offering isn’t focused on a PTaaS platform or dashboard.
Clients of Rhino often praise their detailed documentation and reporting, as the reports tend to be very comprehensive, including step-by-step attack narratives and mitigation guidance. As such, organizations with complicated infrastructure or regulatory pressure are likely to find Rhino appealing. However, for contemporary SaaS teams handling frequent release cycles, the absence of a centralized testing platform or self-service tooling might limit the experience’s flexibility.
Website: https://rhinosecuritylabs.com/
7. Pentera
Best for: Mature security teams or service providers that want an automated penetration testing tool for continuous validation.
Pentera is a slightly different entry on this list, as Pentera is primarily a software platform rather than a service. However, it occupies the same space of “continuous security validation” thanks to their Automated Security Validation platform, which essentially performs automated penetration testing on your network and systems. The platform can simulate a variety of attacks, from network breach attempts to credential theft to lateral movement, all without a human operator.
The primary capabilities of Pentera include testing all layers of security for misconfigurations or exploitable paths, and providing a clear remediation roadmap for any successful exploit chain. It’s worth noting that Pentera requires an internal team to operate and monitor results. Pentera is ideal for organizations that have a lot of network infrastructure or on-prem systems and need to regularly assess them at scale – such as financial institutions, large corporations, or managed security providers.
Website: https://pentera.io/
8. SecureLayer7
Best for: Budget-conscious organizations and fast-moving dev teams that still demand a robust pentest.
SecureLayer7 is a security services company that has developed its own PTaaS platform known as “BugDazz”. A key selling point of SecureLayer7’s offering is speed and ease of use. They advertise “Pentest on the fly” with a ready-to-go platform that can on-board customers and launch tests extremely quickly. This rapid kickoff is facilitated by a streamlined scoping and customer onboarding workflow which minimizes delays. For companies needing an urgent pentest (e.g., due to a last-minute audit or a sudden security concern), this speed is invaluable.
The BugDazz platform provides real-time vulnerability insights and continuous monitoring. In addition, BugDazz integrates with development tools such as Jira for direct notification and reporting. Though its lack of more comprehensive features or customized support may limit its suitability for more complex environments or high-stakes compliance testing, SecureLayer7 is a solid choice for startups and small to midsize businesses that require the advantages of PTaaS (speed, ongoing insights) at a more affordable price point.
Website: https://securelayer7.net/home
How to Choose the Right PTaaS Partner
One of the main considerations when choosing a new PTaaS partner should be to match your company maturity with the provider. In other words, startup companies require different providers than a well-established enterprise organisation for instance. Therefore looking for someone that understands your business model and requirements can go a long way.
Credentials are another important factor, whether they are GIAC, OSWE or CREST certified for instance. However, as Ewelina Baran from Blaze Infosec states, it is also “desirable that the provider has a hacker mindset and ‘think out of the box’ creativity to go beyond common checklists” [4].
Therefore, you should aim to choose a partner that understands your stage, as startups may prioritize fast onboarding, while enterprises may need advanced integrations and SLAs. Next, consider matching the partner to fit your testing frequency needs, as some platforms excel at ad hoc testing, while others offer continuous pentesting with real-time monitoring and integrations.
Another important factor is compliance. Do you need to comply with an audit quickly, then opting for vendors with pre-mapped compliance report templates might be the way to go. And finally, it is also a good idea to consider your internal engineering team and their preferences, so that your teams can benefit from the shared knowledge and feedback.
Evaluate Cybri for Your Next Pentest
Cybri is ideal for companies prioritizing speed, clarity, and compliance. All testers are US-based and certified, while the powerful BlueBox platform enables real-time collaboration with testers, fast kickoff, and reports ready for audits. If your team needs a reliable partner that balances service quality with fast results, Cybri should be on your shortlist. Want to learn more? Request a free consultation or see a sample report today!
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS)?
A: PTaaS is a modern approach to penetration testing that delivers the service via a cloud platform on an ongoing or on-demand basis. With PTaaS, you typically subscribe to a platform that combines automated scanning tools with human-led pentesting, and you interact through an online dashboard.
Q: How fast are PTaaS reports delivered compared to traditional pentesting?
A: One of the big advantages of PTaaS is speed. In a traditional pentest, you often wait weeks to schedule testers, then wait until the end of the engagement to receive a static PDF report. PTaaS accelerates that timeline in multiple ways, as engagements can start faster and results often are delivered in real-time through the platform.
Q: What is the cost range for PTaaS? Is it more expensive than regular pentesting?
A: The cost for PTaaS varies depending on the provider and the scope of what you’re testing, but it’s often comparable to traditional pentesting – and sometimes more flexible. Many vendors offer subscription pricing that covers a certain number of tests or assets, as well as one-off pricing. For a rough benchmark, traditional penetration tests might cost on the order of $10k–30k for a mid-sized web application test, and upwards of six figures for very large or complex scopes [5].
Q: Are PTaaS reports and services compliant with frameworks like SOC 2, HIPAA, or ISO 27001?
A: Yes, most PTaaS providers design their services to help customers meet common compliance requirements. The reports issued by reputable PTaaS vendors typically contain the necessary details such as scope, methodology, findings with severity ratings, and remediation steps – all of which are useful for an audit. Many providers will map their findings to relevant compliance criteria.
